Part 106(3) provides that just prosecution evidence is admissible under section 101(1)(g).

Part 106(3) provides that just prosecution evidence is admissible under section 101(1)(g).

The simple denial associated with prosecution instance will never be enough to trigger this gateway – see R v Fitzgerald 2017 EWCA Crim 556 of where it really is being suggested not simply that prosecution witnesses are lying but have actually conspired to pervert the program of justice by placing their minds together to concoct an allegation that is false R v Pedley 2014 EWCA Crim 848.

Unlike area 105, area 106 will not have a supply permitting a defendant to disassociate himself from an imputation. Prosecutors should consequently be mindful whenever wanting to count on this gateway on such basis as issues raised because of the defendant outside of the test yet not relied on in proof. Begin to see the commentary in R v Nelson 2006 EWCA Crim 3412; “It will have been incorrect for the prosecution to get to have comments that are such a jury in order to supply a foundation for satisfying gateway (g) and having the defendant’s previous convictions place in evidence.

Read More